Indentation Modulus: Difference between revisions
Oluschinski (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Oluschinski (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Language_sel|LANG=ger|ARTIKEL=Eindringmodul}} | |||
{{PSM_Infobox}} | {{PSM_Infobox}} | ||
<span style="font-size:1.2em;font-weight:bold;">Indentation modulus</span> | <span style="font-size:1.2em;font-weight:bold;">Indentation modulus</span> | ||
| Line 38: | Line 39: | ||
==Application limits== | ==Application limits== | ||
When using the indentation modulus ''E''<sub>IT</sub>, it is important to note that although ''E''<sub>IT</sub> is fundamentally equivalent to a [[Elastic Modulus | modulus of elasticity]], it only describes the [[Stiffness|stiffness]] behaviour very locally and under [[Multiaxial Stress State|triaxial loading]]. This results in a difference in value to the [[Material Value | characteristic values]] of the [[Elastic Modulus | modulus of elasticity]], which were determined using conventional [[Polymer Testing | | When using the indentation modulus ''E''<sub>IT</sub>, it is important to note that although ''E''<sub>IT</sub> is fundamentally equivalent to a [[Elastic Modulus | modulus of elasticity]], it only describes the [[Stiffness|stiffness]] behaviour very locally and under [[Multiaxial Stress State|triaxial loading]]. This results in a difference in value to the [[Material Value | characteristic values]] of the [[Elastic Modulus | modulus of elasticity]], which were determined using conventional [[Polymer Testing | polymer testing]] methods, such as the [[Uniaxial Stress State|uniaxial]] [[Tensile Test | tensile]] or [[Compression Test | compression test]] or the [[Bend Test#The three-point bending test method|three-]] or [[Bend Test#The four-point bending test method|four-point bending test]]. The indentation modulus can therefore not be used for dimensioning purposes. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 48: | Line 49: | ||
*[[Indentation Fracture Mechanics|Indentation fracture mechanics]] | *[[Indentation Fracture Mechanics|Indentation fracture mechanics]] | ||
==References== | |||
{| | {| | ||
| Line 54: | Line 55: | ||
|[1] | |[1] | ||
|ISO 14577: Metallic Materials – Instrumented Indentation Test for Hardness and Materials Parameters | |ISO 14577: Metallic Materials – Instrumented Indentation Test for Hardness and Materials Parameters | ||
* Part 1 ( | * Part 1 (2026-06): Test Method | ||
* Part 2 ( | * Part 2 (2025-06): Verification and Calibration of Testing Machines | ||
* Part 3 ( | * Part 3 (2025-05): Calibration of Reference Blocks | ||
* Part 4 (2016-11): Test Method for Metallic and Non-metallic Coatings | * Part 4 (2016-11): Test Method for Metallic and Non-metallic Coatings | ||
* Part 5 (2022-10): Linear Elastic Dynamic Instrumented Indentation Testing (DIIT) | * Part 5 (2022-10): Linear Elastic Dynamic Instrumented Indentation Testing (DIIT) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:43, 4 September 2026
| A service provided by |
|---|
|
| Polymer Service GmbH Merseburg |
| Tel.: +49 3461 30889-50 E-Mail: info@psm-merseburg.de Web: https://www.psm-merseburg.de |
| Our further education offers: https://www.psm-merseburg.de/weiterbildung |
| PSM on Wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer Service Merseburg |
Indentation modulus
Definition of the indentation modulus
The indentation modulus EIT (in MPa) is determined in the micro load range of the hardness test using a method described in detail in ISO 14577 [1] from the initial rise of the unloading curve of the load (F)–indentation depth (h) diagram (see: instrumented hardness testing – method & material parameters) at the maximum load Fmax (dF/dh|Fmax). In the nanolast range of hardness testing, the method according to Oliver and Pharr is usually used [2]. According to ISO 14577, it is taken into account that the mechanical resistances of the test specimen and diamond indenter are connected in parallel (see Figure and Eq. 1)
| (1) |
This results in EIT:
| (2) |
from which the following expression can be derived using the relationships described in detail in ISO 14577:
| (3) |
The Poisson's ratio required to calculate EIT is known for most materials and is relatively independent of temperature. The value 8.73 x 10-13 Pa-1 is the effective compliance of diamond.
Application limits
When using the indentation modulus EIT, it is important to note that although EIT is fundamentally equivalent to a modulus of elasticity, it only describes the stiffness behaviour very locally and under triaxial loading. This results in a difference in value to the characteristic values of the modulus of elasticity, which were determined using conventional polymer testing methods, such as the uniaxial tensile or compression test or the three- or four-point bending test. The indentation modulus can therefore not be used for dimensioning purposes.
See also
- Elastic modulus
- Instrumented hardness testing – method & material parameters
- vickers hardness
- Ultrasound – elastic parameters
- Indentation fracture mechanics
References
| [1] | ISO 14577: Metallic Materials – Instrumented Indentation Test for Hardness and Materials Parameters
|
| [2] | Oliver, W. C., Pharr, G. M.: An Improved Technique for Determining Hardness and Elastic Modulus using Load and Displacement Sensing Indentation. J. of Materials Research 7 (1992) 1564–1583 |

