Jump to content

J-Integral Concept: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia of plastics testing
Created page with "{{Language_sel|LANG=ger|ARTIKEL=J-Integral-Konzept}} {{PSM_Infobox}} <span style="font-size:1.2em;font-weight:bold;">''J''-integral concept</span> __FORCETOC__ ==Energetic consideration of the fracture process== The ''J''-integral introduced by Cherepanov [1] and Rice [2] has gained the greatest importance for plastics due to the energetic consideration of the fracture process (see: Fracture mechanics and Fracture Types | types..."
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
==Energetic consideration of the fracture process==
==Energetic consideration of the fracture process==


The ''J''-integral introduced by Cherepanov [1] and Rice [2] has gained the greatest importance for [[Plastics | plastics]] due to the energetic consideration of the fracture process (see: [[Fracture Mechanics | Fracture mechanics]] and [[Fracture Types | types of fracture]]). The path-independent contour integral encloses the plastically deformed region and runs in the elastic deformed region with a closed integration path around the crack tip ('''Figure 1''').
The ''J''-integral introduced by Cherepanov [1] and Rice [2] has gained the greatest importance for [[Plastics | plastics]] due to the energetic consideration of the fracture process (see: [[Fracture Mechanics | fracture mechanics]] and [[Fracture Types | types of fracture]]). The path-independent contour integral encloses the plastically deformed region and runs in the elastic deformed region with a closed integration path around the crack tip ('''Figure 1''').


[[file:J-Integral.jpg|500px]]
[[file:J-IntConcept-1.jpg|500px]]
{|  
{|  
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"

Revision as of 08:12, 15 December 2025

Sprachauswahl/Language selection
Dieser Artikel ist auch auf Deutsch verfügbar J-Integral-Konzept
A service provided by
verweis=
Polymer Service GmbH Merseburg
Tel.: +49 3461 30889-50
E-Mail: info@psm-merseburg.de
Web: https://www.psm-merseburg.de
Our further education offers:
https://www.psm-merseburg.de/weiterbildung
PSM on Wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer Service Merseburg

J-integral concept


Energetic consideration of the fracture process

The J-integral introduced by Cherepanov [1] and Rice [2] has gained the greatest importance for plastics due to the energetic consideration of the fracture process (see: fracture mechanics and types of fracture). The path-independent contour integral encloses the plastically deformed region and runs in the elastic deformed region with a closed integration path around the crack tip (Figure 1).

Fig. 1: Determination of the J-integral: path-independent contour integral with 1 – plastically deformed area (energy-dissipative zone) and 2 – elastically deformed area (a), experimentally determined load vs. load-line displacement curves of different crack lengths (b), energy determined by planimetrating the dependency F = F(v, f) dependence, related to the specimen thickness as a function of the crack length (c) and J-integral (d) determined by differentiating the curves (c) [3].

The x- und y-components are defined by

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle J_x\,=\, \int_{R} \left( W \,dy-T_{ij} \cdot n_j \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}dR\right)} und
Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle J_y\,=\, \int_{R} \left( -W \,dx-T_{ij} \cdot n_j \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}dR\right)} .

with

W elastic energy density
T stress tensor
n components oft the unit vector to R around the crack tip
u displacement vector components

Experimental determination of J-values

The experimental determination is carried out according to Fig. 1 b to d by determining the deformation energy AG from the registered load vs. load line displacement curves with different notch depths by planimetry and displaying the ratio AG/B as a function of a. The deformation energy AG is then determined by the graphical differentiation.

Using graphical differentiation, the following results

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle J\,=\,\frac{1}{B} \frac{\partial A_G}{\partial a}}

as function of the load-line displacement resp. deflection.

Since the effort to determine J-values according to this procedure is too high for practical characteristic value determination, approximation formulas have been developed. The best-known procedures are:

Correlations of the J-integral to the stress intensity factor and the crack opening displacement

For elastic material behaviour, the J-integral is identical to the energy release rate G:

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle J_I\,=\,G_I\,=\,\frac{{K_I}^2}{E}} for ESZ resp.
Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle J_I\,=\,G_I\,=\,\frac{{K_I}^2}{E} \left(1- {\nu}^2 \right)} for EDZ.

These equations are to be used for the conversion of JIc values into KIcJ values.

The relationship between J-integral and Crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) concept provides

,

where m is called the constraint factor according to [4, 5]. The critical J-values are geometry-independent, i.e. real material values, if the criterion

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B{,}\ a{,}\ \left( W-a \right)\,\ge\,\varepsilon \frac{J}{\sigma_y}}

with

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \varepsilon \!} material-dependent constant of the geometry criterion of the J-integral concept

is fulfilled.

In [6], the relationship between the fracture mechanical parameters determined according to the J-integral and the CTOD concept is considered using the example of the temperature dependence of the toughness of unoriented and cold-rolled oriented polypropylene ( abbreviation: PP). For the constraint factor, m = 0.7 is given for the examined PP material [7].

See also


References

[1] Cherepanov, G. P.: On Crack Propagation in Continuous Media. Applied Mechanics and Mathematics 31 (1967) 503
[2] Rice, J. R.: A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks. J. Appl. Mech. (1968) 379–386
[3] Grellmann, W., Seidler, S. (Eds.):Polymer Testing. Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich (2022) 3. Edition, p. 239–241 (ISBN 978-1-56990-806-8; E-Book ISBN: 878-1-56990-807-5; see AMK-Library under A 23)
[4] Blumenauer, H., Pusch, G.: Technische Bruchmechanik. Deutscher Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie, Leipzig Stuttgart (1993) 3. Auflage, (ISBN 3-342-00659-5; siehe AMK-Library under E 29-3)
[5] Anderson, T. L.: Fracture Mechanics. Fundamentals and Applications. 2nd Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton (1995) 2. Auflage, (ISBN 978-0849342608; siehe AMK-Library under E 8-1), DOI: [1]
[6] Grellmann, W., Che, M.: Assessment of Temperature-dependent Fracture Behaviour with Different Fracture Mechanics Concepts on Example of Unoriented and Cold-rolled Polypropylene. J. Applied Polymer Science 66 (1997) 1237–1249; https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19971114)66:7%3C1237::AID-APP4%3E3.0.CO;2-H
[7] Hille, E.: Untersuchungen zum Bruchverhalten des orientierten isotaktischen Polypropylen. Ph.D. Dissertation, Technische Hochschule Leuna-Merseburg (1983)