Jump to content

Geometry Criterion

From Encyclopedia of plastics testing
Sprachauswahl/Language selection
Dieser Artikel ist auch auf Deutsch verfügbar Geometriekriterium
A service provided by
verweis=
Polymer Service GmbH Merseburg
Tel.: +49 3461 30889-50
E-Mail: info@psm-merseburg.de
Web: https://www.psm-merseburg.de
Our further education offers:
https://www.psm-merseburg.de/weiterbildung
PSM on Wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer Service Merseburg

Geometry criterion


Geometry criterion, fracture tougness

In the linear-elastic approach, the geometric variables B, a and the ligament expansion (Wa) are estimated using the empirically determined relationship

with

y Yield stress (yield point).

The geometry constant is material-dependent.

Experimental results regarding the influence of the test specimen thickness B on the fracture mechanical properties (see: fracture mechanical testing) for plastics are available in the literature. Figure 1 shows the dependence of the coefficient according to the above equation on the fracture toughness determined under quasi-static and impact loading (see: impact loading of plastics) for various plastics. The relationship shown was established on the basis of experimentally determined thickness and a/W dependencies and has a high degree of generalisation, as a common relationship results regardless of the type of stress (quasi-static, impact) and the material failure (stable, unstable) (see: Crack propagation).

Fig. 1: Dependence of the coefficient on the fracture toughness KIc, KId for different plastics


References

Geometry criterion, J-integral concept

Due to the elastic-plastic material behaviour typical of plastics, especially with decreasing test specimen thickness, decreasing stress velocity and increasing temperature, and the limits for the applicability of linear-elastic fracture mechanics, it is necessary to use the J-integral concept to describe the geometry dependence. The critical J-values are geometry-independent if the criterion

with

material-dependent constant of the geometry criterion of the J-integral concept

is fulfilled.

For the geometry constant from this criterion, Figure 2 shows a tendency to decrease with increasing toughness, which , like the geometry constant , must be regarded as a material-dependent variable and can assume values between 5 and 1220, which represent maximum values for impact loading.

Fig. 2: Dependence of the coefficients on the J-value for different plastics

Knowledge of the general -J relationship allows the required test specimen thicknesses to be estimated. The advantage of determining fracture mechanics values under impact loading lies in the possibility of obtaining geometry-independent values even at low test specimen thicknesses.


References

  • Grellmann, W., Seidler, S., Lach, R.: Geometrieunabhängige bruchmechanische Werkstoffkenngrößen – Voraussetzung für die Zähigkeitscharakterisierung von Kunststoffen. Materialwissenschaften und Werkstofftechnik 32 (2001) 552–561
  • Grellmann, W.: New Developments in Toughness Evaluation of Polymers and Compounds by Fracture Mechanics. In: Grellmann, W., Seidler, S.: Deformation and Fracture Behaviour of Polymers. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2001) p. 3–26, (ISBN 3-540-41247-6; see AMK-Library under A 7)

Geometry criterion, crack opening displacement

The requirements for the test specimen geometry are estimated using the Crack tip opening displacement concept

.

with

material-dependent constant of the geometry criterion of the CTOD concept

Fig. 3: Dependence of the coefficient on the critical crack opening Idk

In addition to the J-integral concept, the CTOD concept is used in particular to describe deformation-determined fracture processes. The prerequisite for determining critical crack openings is the formation of a quasi-static stress state. On the basis of the “Plastic Hinge Model”, the critical crack opening is determined for impact-type loading, which is independent of the a/W ratio at B = 4 mm for a/W > 0.2. Figure 3 shows that -values between 10 and 90 can be assumed and that a considerable overestimation of the required minimum test specimen dimensions is possible if the necessary notch depth or test specimen thickness is still unknown.

See also


References