SENB-Specimen: Difference between revisions
Oluschinski (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{Language_sel|LANG=ger|ARTIKEL=SENB-Prüfkörper}} {{PSM_Infobox}} <span style="font-size:1.2em;font-weight:bold;">SENB-specimen</span> __FORCETOC__ The English abbreviation SENB stands for "single-edge notched bend" and the SENB test specimen is referred to in German as a three-point bending test specimen. ==Requirements for the test specimen geometry== In the experimental determination of fracture mechanical values, the following basic conditions must be observed:..." |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 14:16, 5 December 2025
| A service provided by |
|---|
|
| Polymer Service GmbH Merseburg |
| Tel.: +49 3461 30889-50 E-Mail: info@psm-merseburg.de Web: https://www.psm-merseburg.de |
| Our further education offers: https://www.psm-merseburg.de/weiterbildung |
| PSM on Wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer Service Merseburg |
SENB-specimen
The English abbreviation SENB stands for "single-edge notched bend" and the SENB test specimen is referred to in German as a three-point bending test specimen.
Requirements for the test specimen geometry
In the experimental determination of fracture mechanical values, the following basic conditions must be observed:
- The test specimen dimensions must be substantially greater than the extent of the plastic zone at the crack tip under the respective test conditions.
- The load, the crack-tip-opening displacement, and the load-load line displacement must be continuously detectable.
- For the calculation of the stress intensity factor K at the moment of the unstable crack propagation, the load on the test specimen and the critical crack length must be exactly determinable.
- For the corresponding test body geometry, the determination equation, e.g. the relationship between loading and crack length should be known.
In order to meet these requirements, a number of specifications have been adopted that have been adopted from the ASTM standard E 399 [1] into the existing standards.
Test specimen
|
| Fig. 1: | Schematic representation of the SENB specimen |
Dimensions (according to [1, 2]):
W = 2 B, special case: W = B up to 4 B
s = 4 W s/W = 4, s = 40 mm
L = 4,5 W
a = (0,45–0,55) W
N 1,5 mm for U- und V-notch for metals
Typical dimensions for plastics (according to [3, 4]):
W = 10 mm
B = 4 mm (variation B = 2...10 mm)
L = 80 mm
s = 40 mm (variation s = 40...70 mm)
a = 2 mm (variation a = 0,5...7,5 mm)
N 1,5 mm
l 1,3 mm (razor blade, notch length)
r 0,25 mm (notch radius)
r 0,125 µm (razor blade, notch radius)
Conditional equation
| für |
Tada [5]:
Srawley und Gross [6]:
for s/W = 4
f2(a/W) shows correspondence with f1 in the range 0 < a/W < 0,6, then lower values
Geometry criterion for metals:
Geometry criterion for plastics:
where: Re = y = tensile yield stress (yield strength)
The geometry constant is material-dependent. (see geometry criterion, fracture toughness)
A comprehensive assortment of suitable test specimens for fracture mechanics investigations in plastics and composites is contained in fracture mechanics test specimens.
See also
References
| [1] | ASTM E 399 (2024): Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials |
| [2] | Blumenauer, H., Pusch, G.: Technische Bruchmechanik. Deutscher Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie, Leipzig Stuttgart (1993) 3. Auflage, (ISBN 3-342-00659-5; see under AMK-Library E 29-3) |
| [3] | Grellmann, W., Seidler, S. (Eds.): Polymer Testing. Carl Hanser Munich (2022) 3. Edition, (ISBN 978-1-56990-806-8; see under AMK-Library A 22) |
| [4] | MPK-Procedure MPK-ICIT (2016): Testing of Plastics – Instrumented Charpy Impact Test: Procedure for Determining the Crack Resistance Behaviour Using the Instrumented Impact Test |
| [5] | Tada, H., Paris, P. C., Irwin, G. R.: The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, 3rd Ed., ASME Press, New York (2000) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.801535 |
| [6] | Srawley, J. E., Gross, B.: Stress Intensity Factors for Bend and Compact Specimens. Engineering Fracture Mechanics (1972) 587–589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(72)90069-0 |
