Jump to content

Adhesive Energy Release Rate

From Encyclopedia of plastics testing
Revision as of 09:28, 3 September 2026 by Oluschinski (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Language_sel|LANG=ger|ARTIKEL=Adhäsive Energiefreisetzungsrate}} {{PSM_Infobox}} <span style="font-size:1.2em;font-weight:bold;">Adhesive energy release rate (Author: Prof. Dr. Michael Nase)</span> __FORCETOC__ ==General== To characterize the peel behaviour of plastic or metal films, as well as metal-plastic composites, the T-peel test based on ASTM D 1876 “Standard Test Method for Peel Resistance of Ad...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Sprachauswahl/Language selection
Dieser Artikel ist auch auf Deutsch verfügbar Adhäsive Energiefreisetzungsrate
A service provided by
verweis=
Polymer Service GmbH Merseburg
Tel.: +49 3461 30889-50
E-Mail: info@psm-merseburg.de
Web: https://www.psm-merseburg.de
Our further education offers:
https://www.psm-merseburg.de/weiterbildung
PSM on Wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer Service Merseburg

Adhesive energy release rate (Author: Prof. Dr. Michael Nase)


General

To characterize the peel behaviour of plastic or metal films, as well as metal-plastic composites, the T-peel test based on ASTM D 1876 “Standard Test Method for Peel Resistance of Adhesives (T-Peel Test)” and the fixed-arm peel test based on the ESIS TC4 standard proposal “Peel Testing of Flexible Laminates” are available.

The methods of linear-elastic fracture mechanics are used for the material-specific description of the peel process, which make it possible to derive parameters with a high information content, such as the energy release rate. Such parameters can then be advantageously used to evaluate the application behaviour of film systems.

Evaluation of the peel behaviour of sealed films using fracture mechanics parameters

The adhesive energy release rate GaIc reflects only the amount of energy required to separate two sealed films (see: sealed seam) and is applicable to elastic-plastic material behaviour.

The adhesive energy release rate GaIc is calculated according to Eq. (1).

(1)

with

Ua direct adhesion energy
EG total peel energy
Ed,P deformation energy of the peel arm
Ed,S deformation energy of the peeled seal seam
W width of the seal seam
L length of the sealed seam

The total peel energy EG corresponds to the area under the peel force–fracture path diagram (also known as the peel curve; see Fig. 1). The deformation energy of the peel arms Ed,P is the energy absorbed by the peel test specimen in the run-up to the actual peel process. In the peel force–fracture path diagram, the start of the peel process is marked by a change in the rise of the peel curve at ld,P, so that the deformation energy of the peel arm Ed,P corresponds to the area under the peel curve up to ld,P. It is assumed that all deformations that occur after ld,P as a result of the increase in force are absorbed by the peeled seal and no longer by the peel arm, since the peeled seal has a greater tendency to deform than the peel arm.

Fig. 1: Representation of the ideal peel curve, i.e., without deformation of the seal seam (dotted curve) compared to the actual peel curve (continuous curve); ld,P – start of the peel process; lB – fracture path; lB,i – fracture path in the ideal peel test; Ed,P – deformation energy of the peel arms; Ed,S – deformation energy of the peeled seal seam and EG,i – ideal total peel energy with permitted deformation of the peel arm

The deformation energy of the peeled seal seam Ed,S is thus calculated by subtracting the ideal total peel energy EG,i, i.e. the total peel energy in the presence of an ideal seal seam with infinite modulus of elasticity (dotted peel curve), from the total peel energy EG according to Eq. (2). It is assumed that the peel arm can also absorb deformations in the presence of an ideal seal seam.

(2)

It is assumed that the deformation energy of the peeled seal seam Ed,S is not influenced by the deformation energy of the peel arms Ed,P, so that the two deformation processes, the deformation of the peel arms and the deformation of the seal seam, occur sequentially. The exact numerical value of the ideal total peel energy EG,i cannot be calculated, but the deformation energy of the peeled seal Ed,S can be approximated using Eq. (3).

(3)

with

lB fracture path in the real peel test
lB,i fracture path in the ideal peel test, i.e., without deformation of the peeled seal seam

The fracture path in the ideal peel test is calculated for the T-peel test according to Eq. (4) and for the fixed-arm peel test according to Eq. (5).

(4)

mit

ld,P start of the peeling process
(5)

with

peel angle

Application example for a PE-LD/iPB-1 peel system

The adhesive energy release rate in the low-density polyethylene peel system blended with isotactic polybutene-1 (abbreviation: PE-LD/iPB-1) is significantly influenced by the blend composition. As a result of the T-peel test, Fig. 2 shows the adhesive energy release rate as a function of the iPB-1 content. The adhesive energy release rate decreases exponentially with increasing iPB-1 content. This dependence is used as a basis for the targeted adjustment of the PE-LD/iPB-1 peel system using fracture mechanical values (see: fracture mechanical testing).

Fig. 2: Influence of the mass content of iPB-1 on the adhesive energy release rate

See also

References