<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.wiki.polymerservice-merseburg.de/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=J-Compliance_Method</id>
	<title>J-Compliance Method - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.wiki.polymerservice-merseburg.de/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=J-Compliance_Method"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wiki.polymerservice-merseburg.de/index.php?title=J-Compliance_Method&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-22T20:07:43Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wiki.polymerservice-merseburg.de/index.php?title=J-Compliance_Method&amp;diff=435&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Oluschinski: Created page with &quot;{{Language_sel|LANG=ger|ARTIKEL=Compliance Methode}} {{PSM_Infobox}} &lt;span style=&quot;font-size:1.2em;font-weight:bold;&quot;&gt;J-Compliance method&lt;/span&gt; __FORCETOC__  ==J-Integral evaluation method – Compliance method==  J-integral evaluation methods are used for the determination of fracture mechanical values according to the  J-integral concept [1].  The first proposal for the experimental determination of &#039;...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wiki.polymerservice-merseburg.de/index.php?title=J-Compliance_Method&amp;diff=435&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-12-03T11:33:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;{{Language_sel|LANG=ger|ARTIKEL=Compliance Methode}} {{PSM_Infobox}} &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:1.2em;font-weight:bold;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J-Compliance method&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; __FORCETOC__  ==J-Integral evaluation method – Compliance method==  &lt;a href=&quot;/index.php/J-Integral_Evaluation_Methods_(Overview)&quot; title=&quot;J-Integral Evaluation Methods (Overview)&quot;&gt;J-integral evaluation methods&lt;/a&gt; are used for the determination of fracture mechanical values according to the &lt;a href=&quot;/index.php/J-Integral_Concept&quot; title=&quot;J-Integral Concept&quot;&gt; J-integral concept&lt;/a&gt; [1].  The first proposal for the experimental determination of &amp;#039;...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Language_sel|LANG=ger|ARTIKEL=Compliance Methode}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PSM_Infobox}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:1.2em;font-weight:bold;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J-Compliance method&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==J-Integral evaluation method – Compliance method==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[J-Integral Evaluation Methods (Overview)|J-integral evaluation methods]] are used for the determination of fracture mechanical values according to the [[J-Integral Concept | J-integral concept]] [1].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first proposal for the experimental determination of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;J&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;IC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was made by &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-variant:small-caps&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Begley&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-variant:small-caps&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Landes&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; [2, 3] and is based on the energetic interpretation of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;J&amp;#039;&amp;#039;-integral according to &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-variant:small-caps&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rice&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; in the following form:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|width=&amp;quot;20px&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|width=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; | &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; J_{I}=-\frac{1}{B}\frac{\partial  A}{\partial a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is also referred to in the literature as the evaluation method according to [[BEGLEY and LANDES – J-Integral Estimation Method | BEGLEY and LANDES]]. Here it is called the J-compliance method for differentiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implementation of the compliance method==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The procedure of the J-compliance method is to be illustrated using the example of impact load (F)–deflection (f) diagrams recorded in the [[Instrumented Charpy Impact Test|instrumented Charpy impact test (ICIT)]] (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fig. 1a to 1c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To carry out the procedure, load–deflection diagrams (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fig. 1a&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) are recorded on several test [[Specimen | specimens]] with different notch depths (in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fig. 1&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, this is limited to three test specimens). The energy &amp;#039;&amp;#039;A&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is determined by integrating the area under the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;F&amp;#039;&amp;#039;–&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; curve for certain &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; values and the ratio &amp;#039;&amp;#039;A&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/B is shown as a function of the crack length (notch depth) (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fig. 1b&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A graphical differentiation (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fig. 1c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) of these curves yields &amp;#039;&amp;#039;J&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, from which the critical &amp;#039;&amp;#039;J&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; values can be obtained after measuring the deflection at the moment of unstable [[Crack Propagation | crack propagation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:Compliance-Method_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
{| &lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|width=&amp;quot;50px&amp;quot;|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fig. 1&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: &lt;br /&gt;
|width=&amp;quot;1000px&amp;quot; |Determination of J-integral according to the J-compliance method: a) load–deflection diagram, b) &amp;#039;&amp;#039;A&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/B–notch depth diagram and c) J-integral–deflection diagram&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Accuracy of the compliance method==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [1], &amp;#039;&amp;#039;J&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; COM&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; values determined using the J-compliance method on two plastics and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;J&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; FEM&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; values calculated using the finite element method (FEM) were compared as a function of the crack length. An overestimation of the toughness was found for the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;J&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; COM&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; values for small crack lengths and an underestimation of the toughness for a crack length (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)/specimen width (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;W&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ratio of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039;/&amp;#039;&amp;#039;W&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;gt; 0.2, which was attributed to an insufficient consideration of the limited specimen geometry. &lt;br /&gt;
A significant disadvantage of this method is the high number of test specimens required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[J-Integral Concept | J-integral concept]]&lt;br /&gt;
*ICIT ([[Instrumented Charpy Impact Test | Instrumented Charpy impact test]])&lt;br /&gt;
*J-integral estimation methods of [[BEGLEY and LANDES – J-Integral Estimation Method | BEGLEY and LANDES]] (BL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;References&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|-valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|[1]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Grellmann,_Wolfgang|Grellmann, W.]]: Beurteilung der Zähigkeitseigenschaften von Polymerwerkstoffen durch bruchmechanische Kennwerte. Habilitation (1986), Technische Hochschule Merseburg, Wiss. Zeitschrift TH Merseburg 28 (1986), H.6, p. 787–788 &lt;br /&gt;
|-valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|[2]&lt;br /&gt;
|Begley, J. A., Landes, J. D: The J-Integral as a Failure Criterion. ASTM STP 514 (1972) p. 1–20&lt;br /&gt;
|-valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|[3]&lt;br /&gt;
|Landes, J. D., Begley, J. A.: The Effect of Specimen Geometry on J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. ASTM STP 514 (1972) p. 24–39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fracture Mechanics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Instrumented Impact Test]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oluschinski</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>